The Finder having a history of occasionally crashing or being slow when moving a very large number of files in one go (as in maybe >100'000 files). The advantage is that you are not using the Finder as the application to move the files.
I also use it to copy my entire boot disk to another disk.īTW, Mylio may be useful to you in consolidating your various sources of files into one large collection. I've been using it that way for some time copying a folder on one disk to a folder on another disk. Use tools such as Carbon Copy Cloner, or Super Duper (my preference) for making an identical copy of a drive onto another - if you try to add another source drive using these, it can get messy, and may well overwrite any existing files or folders if you have any with the same names.Ĭarbon Copy Cloner handles selected items, not just entire disks. It's not copy/paste that you need either, it's drag and drop.Īll you need to do is open a window for the source and destination drives, select all the folders/files for copying, and drag them onto the destination drive (create new folders if needed for organising). In this case CCC isn't what you need, it's for copying an entire drive onto another to create two identical drives (hence the name). What is the advantage of using Carbon Copy Cloner for purpose of transferring large files or individual large folders? Should I invest into a Carbon Copy Cloner, or just use copy/paste entire drive content? Will transfer and combine several HD's with photo files onto a larger one, than reformat the old one and use it for new photos. The iMac and the 16 is backed up to Crashplan.I am just about to clean up my collection of external USB Hard Drives. All of my data sits on the 16 and is backed up via TM to the 20. I now have an iMac that has two OWC RAID 5 drives attached (16tb and 20tb). I then decided to get a more permanent solution for my office that stays put and stays backed up.
#Carbon copy cloner vs superduper 2016 software#
Luckily, a disk recovery software got the missing data (except for the actual one corrupt file) and all is well. There was a week that passed that I didn't connect and make those happen. I travel a decent amount so the gaping hole in my strategy was that when my laptop wasn't home, CCC wasn't copying data to the backup AND Crashplan wasn't running. The main drive had a corrupt file on it causing me to initially not be able to get any data off of it. I actually was using CCC to duplicate my external drive that contained all of my data to another external drive.
I feel pretty confident about this approach. And Crash Plan is my off-site backup (which, as a bonus, also does versioning). Carbon Copy Cloner performs two staggered bootable backups, one daily, the other weekly. I use Time Machine, Carbon Copy Cloner, and Crash Plan. Just make sure at least one of the solutions is off site to protect against fire, theft, or other site disaster. The non-technical can start with just one of those to keep it simple, then add another layer of security when comfortable. The three methods are complementary, so using them together only makes backups more disaster-proof and help quick recovery from different disasters or mistakes. I use Carbon Copy Cloner (SuperDuper is good too) to keep a complete bootable clone of every drive so that if a drive dies, the clone can be put into service immediately with practically no downtime.Īnd while I rotate my clone drives off site, I'm considering adding online backup (like CrashPlan) to fill in my off-site backups between trips to the safe deposit box. I use Time Machine to keep versions of files that go back months. That is kind of the key to the whole answer, along with the idea that it is not an either/or. These three products backup your data in different ways, as a result they each serve different purposes best.
0 kommentar(er)
